Friday, June 14, 2013

When We Were Young


When kids are young, they are full of dreams and grand ideas.  They tell us they will grow up to be football players or super heroes or firemen or singers or even Barbie Dolls.  Eventually adults reason these dreams out of them.  Parents and society demands more practical thinking.  Sure, children are raised to believe in grand horizons; Santa Claus, and ends of rainbows with pots of gold coins, and the tooth fairy, but it’s not a perspective they’re allowed to sustain for very long.
We don’t raise our children to be greeters at Wal Mart or welders or car parts salesmen or longshoremen or even signature counters.  Not that there is anything wrong with these professions.  Deep down, we parents are as idealistic as our kids.  I would have loved to have The Boy become a pro basketball player or superhero, and The Girl would have made a better actress than Lindsay Lohan and been far less crazy. 
Somewhere and at some time our kids are drawn to the kinds of professions and lifestyles they see around them and, one day – and we never know when that one day is – they begin to think in terms of comfortable and obtainable choices.  Seemingly gone are the childhood dreams they thought were not only possible, but also practical.  And as parents we applaud when our kids say they want to be a lawyer or a doctor or engineer because it makes sense to everyone and there are centuries of documentation that these are wise professional choices.  Everyone involved feels OK with this.
But something is lost somewhere, isn’t it?  What transpired from our children’s simple desires to exceed expectations in their careers from the time they hit junior high school until they have to choose a respectable college?  Is it just simply growing up?  I believe it’s something more.  It’s teachers and parents and television that encourages – and expects – our kids to have their feet planted on the ground and choose a lifestyle and profession that fits better into making a buck and raising a family.
When I was nine, my teacher asked the class to tell her what we wanted to be when we grew up.  I wish I knew the old Woody Allen joke back them, “Anyone but me,” I would have answered.  Instead, I told her I wanted to be Mark Twain.  My teacher attempted to correct me and said, “You mean you want to be a writer like Mark Twain.”  I said I was sticking with the Mark Twain goal and I think I was sent home with a note for my parents telling them I was a silly, silly boy – and not a very good writer either.  
The truth was, I wanted to be Mark Twain.  I read about him in the Encyclopedia and the life he lead, with grand adventures and storytelling and his biting wit.  It seemed like the perfect life to want to live.  My mother, god bless her soul, encouraged me to be Mark Twain and gave me Reader’s Digest versions of his books to look through and told me stories about Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer.  I even ran away from home when I was 11 to live like Tom Sawyer – an event that led to fewer stories about life on the Mississippi. 
It only seems that much more paradoxical that I ended up in the business that either found me, or one that I found.  If politics is a science – and it seems so far from that – then it’s awfully strange that I would have decided to spend the past 34 years practicing it.  I craved a creative outlet and went after a science instead.  Does that make sense?  My business is stultifying and the only time I find it interesting is when it’s in trouble and creativity is needed to crawl our way out of it.  
To boil up some interest in my business I concocted a series of diversions.  I created other businesses, took my show on the road to faraway places and even had times when I allowed myself to revel in my accomplishments.  But it was never enough.  I never stopped searching for something better or something different.  Foolishly I spent my time and effort on small tweaks to make my businesses more acceptable, never stopping to think that, in all my efforts to enjoy more what I did from 9-5 (more like 11-9), I forgot I wore the Ruby Slippers.  The answer to my search for something meaningful in my work life has always been to write.  I was just afraid of losing my position as a provider for my family or, perhaps as importantly, afraid I wouldn’t succeed. 
Now, 45 years later, the little kid in me is coming back (some would say the little kid never left, but those people obviously have cooties).  I write a bit each day and when I’m not writing, I work out plot lines and character development in my head.  As typical of me, I have a few books rattling around in my thoughts (and the blog), but I think I need to have the multiple intrusions to keep my mind from slipping from its anchor. 
I guess it’s no secret to anyone who knows me that I’ve wanted to be a writer.  I’ve been saying it for decades, but doing little about it.  The interesting fact is the only time I write is when I’m not talking much about it.   These cycles come and go.  I have more than 400 pages of a novel written that I began in 2003.  Most of the 400 pages were written in a few months and the other pages where written in tortured moments, in paragraphs at a time (and sometimes only a single paragraph survived).  I have stacks of other pages of other ideas lying around, unfinished and orphaned.  But they are like old friends that I visit from time to time and it’s good to catch up to a thought or a feeling I had when I wrote those little odds and ends.
There has been speculation about where I’ve been and where I’m going over the last five years or so.  I admit to being one of those speculators.  Deep down, I think I chose a journey that would scratch the itch of those childhood dreams that I never completely allowed to be reasoned out of me.  Perhaps it was my mother’s continued insistence that I never settle for anything less than my silly dreams that kept this childlike attitude going against all normal and rational thought. 
I got hooked on a profession that covered other aspects of my life that I so wanted growing up: being a good father, husband and provider.  I like to think I succeeded at most of those desires, even though I spiked the ball prior to crossing the goal line.  But I wouldn’t trade what I was for my kids for anything or any novel because I know I was at my best when I was present for them.  The only person I wasn’t always present for was me. 
Because I kept my deeper desires unknown to so many, the contradiction is laid bare and it’s confusing to some.  It’s difficult to explain to people that I want to tend to my own garden when there are so many beautiful gardens surrounding me; some that I helped shape.   To keep the metaphor going for an excruciating moment longer, I’ve allowed what I want to do to be strangled by the weeds left unattended in my garden to make sure that everyone around me could grow.  At more than half a century of living, I think it’s time to let me do my own growing.
Books are written and read in chapters.  I think it’s done that way because our life is lived in chapters – we have our youth, our teenage years, the college years, young adult years trying to join into the next chapter, the adult years.  And then we have children and careers and a mid-life crisis or two.  Somehow we re-group and begin to want to figure out how to live the life we long ago wanted for ourselves.  Maybe I’m at this chapter now and I so much want to peek at the end to see how it turns out.  Why don’t I just write a good ending?



Thursday, June 13, 2013

When Is It Obama's Fault?


President Truman famously had a plaque on his desk that read, “The buck stops here.”  Events that happened the last century are often frowned on and those who focus on historical statements are derided as someone who wants to take us back to the Fifties.  But, every now and again, our old, white male leaders made an important point.

If in 1946 the buck stopped with the president, where does the buck stop now?  From the way the current president has talked the last five-plus years, the buck seems to hit his desk and ricochet back in time to the desk of George W. Bush.   Can anyone think of something negative President Obama took responsibility for?  He has no problem touting good news that happened while he’s president, but he’s something of a savant at deflecting the blame for gloomy news to others.

The media never seems to call him on it so, let’s pretend this blog is an actual news service that has finally asked the question, “When is it Obama’s fault?”

This post was spurred in part by a news story that pointed out the lack of inventory for home sales in the wealthiest zip codes.  It seems the nation’s richest homebuyers are ready to write a check, but there aren’t enough 20,000 square foot homes for hungry real estate agents to show them.  What this dire circumstance in real estate demonstrates is, under Obama, the rich have indeed gotten richer and the poor and middle class – now with record numbers on food stamps, unemployment and disability – have gotten poorer. 

Spoils going to the wealthy aren’t supposed to happen under a democratic administration but the storyline goes that they are under greedy republican polices.  The facts tell us the reverse is the truth and particularly are so under this president.  Wall Street is in the midst of an embarrassing shower of riches of late, created in large part by democrat-backed legislation such as Dodd-Frank, the auto bailouts and the nearly $1 trillion economic stimulus that was little more than corporate welfare that picked survivors out of the bucket of democrat contributors. 

And there have been plenty of contributors from Wall Street as nearly all lined up to support Obama’s 2012 campaign.  Of course this is nothing new as big business always supports the party in power.  Wall Street never cares about a candidate’s foreign policy or social policy, but it cares mightily about how much they can continue to utilize a financial system they lobbied to create.  It’s precisely why Wall Street supports immigration reform.  It’s not about poor immigrants yearning to be free, it’s a little about brining in new customers and a lot about cheap labor.  The bottom line always trumps good policy.

Nothing that Wall Street and corporatists are doing is new.  What’s new is how shameless Obama talks of division of the classes; saying he’s working hard for the middle class as if he’s only president for one segment of our population.  However, the middle class has been hit the hardest under his presidency and will be hit even harder once Obamacare is fully implemented.  It would be more accurate to say he’s been the president for the One Percent.  If the Occupy Wall Street crowd needs to occupy a CEO’s private residence, may I suggest 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.?