I read the other day there was a movement to counter the Latino’s Day Without a Mexican, scheduled with unintentional irony on May Day. The plan is to have a similar day to demonstrate the power wielded by another special interest group, in this case a forgotten special interest group, and have A Day Without an American. I have an inkling the consequences of the latter would reverberate a bit more. That is if we could get the average American to believe taking a day off work to demonstrate had a real value.
And what is an American? Aren’t most of the Latinos demonstrating either American or people seeking to become American? With the exception of Native Americans and the occasional Viking, we’re all from someplace else, but we’ve melted into a weird and homogenized nation better than any other country on the planet so it’s difficult to notice national origins now. Why is it too much for anyone who wants to find a better life in America to be asked to share in this miracle of assimilation?
The Europeans are struggling with a huge surge in immigration, principally from Muslims, and are facing chaos as a result. The reason isn’t so much the surge as the fact that there is no desire of the immigrants to mix so much as a thimble full of European culture into the culture they have brought with them. For the most part, the immigrants live in segregated enclaves in the poorest sections of Europe’s major cities with no opportunity to find work and no desire to learn anything about their host country. The U.S. will face a similar reality if it doesn’t continue an organized route to citizenship.
The immigrants knocking on our door may be seeking an orderly process or maybe just a free-for-all at Ellis Island. It’s far from clear what the demonstrators want. Is it blanket amnesty and then have the door closed behind them? This was done in 1986 when we gave amnesty to 3 million illegal immigrants with the proviso that there would be no more free passes to enter the country illegally. On the surface, it appears the demand is for the 10 million or more people in the country illegally to bypass the due process faced by all other immigrants, including criminal background checks, and be given citizenship. This is akin to someone breaking into your house and taking up residence in your basement and then telling you there is a good chance that 10 other members of his family will be joining him.
We also hear a lot of noise about this being the next civil rights crusade. This should be an insult of the highest degree to blacks who fought for simple acceptance on the basic principle of the founding of the nation that all men were created equal. They sought the right to vote, the right to enter our schools, basic equal treatment and to no longer be forced into segregation. But there stood Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, forever shameless racial ambulance chasers, equating the two struggles.
Latinos would do better by learning how to articulate and frame their goals. Americans instinctively know the difference between these two civil rights crusades. Blacks were owed. For centuries they had been the victims of a historic national crime. The principal crime involved in the immigrant crusade is the violation of immigration laws by the illegals themselves.
Just to make this mess even messier, politicians have decided to wade into this to shore up votes from all the proposed incoming voters. Nothing snaps a politician into action faster than an opportunity to appeal to millions of newly registered voters. This occurs to Peggy Noonan, writing in the Wall Street Journal. She is the granddaughter of immigrants, and writes movingly and with touching sentiment about the bravery and courage of desperate men and women who leave their homeland in search of a good life. Nevertheless, she says, "I think open-borders proponents are, simply, wrong. I think those who call good people like members of the voluntary border patrols 'yahoos' are snobs. I think those whose primary concern is preserving the Hispanic vote for the Democratic Party, or not losing the Hispanic vote for the Republican Party, are being cynical, selfish, and stupid, too. It's not at all about who gets what vote, it's about continuing a system of laws that has allowed America to become, among many other things, a place immigrants want to come to. And it's about admitting immigrants in a coherent, orderly, legal manner, with an eye first to what America needs. That's how you continue a good thing, which is what we've had." I couldn’t have said this better myself.
If things continue down this negative path, I might just have to apply for immigrant status in New Zealand. In 10 years, after proving my value to the country, I just may get there. And, if you need a humorous take on this, read the Sladed Blog for a laugh at http://sladed.blogspot.com/.
9 comments:
What bothers me with many legal immigrants as well as illegal immigrants, is a culture where many come to this fine country but aren’t willing to embrace any of its identity. That’s unless of course you call the almighty American dollar an identity. If you don’t, then you are slapping the hand that feeds you. If you don’t embrace any part of it, why do you come at all? I understand those who would like to bring part of their culture and values with them, but you can’t come to this country and expect to bring 100% of your culture and then in turn expect Americans to embrace you. Americans are accepting you into their country at our values and that’s the way it is. Not visa versa. It’s as though they really want to be back in their own country but they want to be able to make the same income, have many opportunities, and the freedom they have while in America. Well, News alert! That’s why it’s called the United States of America. We have fought, worked hard and strived to have this identity. It’s not Americas fault your country chose not to go that route. So, either embrace it or get the hell out!
You're probably still uptight about my Peter Frampton comments.
You're probably still uptight about my Peter Frampton comments.
I don't know why that got posted twice. I only meant that once.
No worries, even if the immigrants won't embrace our culture, their kids will be sucked into the American culture much to the despair of their parents. The parents will force their culture onto the resistant kids who will be smoking and wearing Levis in no time. The grandkids won't even speak their grandparents native language.
Within 2 short generations, they are full-fledged Americans fighting the influx of new immigrants.
Laz: You better not get me worked up. Didn't my Bro tell you I have high blood pressure?
The person above that said "even if the immigrants won't embrace our culture, their kids will be sucked into the American culture much to the despair of their parents." Is remembering history correctly. However, I don't believe things are like they were. The latest immigrants seem to be demanding more and giving less. The latest immigrants seem to be less grateful to be here and more indignant that they aren't getting more. The latest immigrants, in short, seem to feel more entitled.
This is why the United States should be choosing who becomes a citizen and who we send home because they are more of a drain on our society than a benefit. We should not be giving citizenship to millions of people who may not be good for our country.
As we tilt towards more takers and fewer givers, the prosperity and the opportunity that has been so prized and valued in this country will begin to disappear more and more. Look at Western Europe.
I am sure you know better than most since you work with the kids and their parents. My gut (which is pretty big these days) tells me you're right.
From "The Office"
Gareth: I work hard. I earn my keep. But unfortunately the history books are full of just people who toil and fight for worthy causes and the freedom of others.
Tim: That's the most profound thing you've ever said mate.
Gareth: Yeah and you don't want that only for foreigners, or women, or disableds to take advantage of it.
Tim: Can I withdraw my last comment?
Post a Comment